Re: READ_UNCOMMITTED problem with SQL 2000 and i-net Opta 2000 JDBC
"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@x.washington.edu> wrote
> Makes sense but if you only do READ_UNCOMMITTED on old data why not just
> partition it?
why an oracle like approach for everything :-) U asked a question whether
READ_UNCOMMITTED has any value, I gave one and I can give many more
examples like this where a particular ISOLATION mode may be appropriate.
Oracle's assumption that its MVRC is best for all situations is plain
horse manure. They should give the flexibility to the developers to
use appropriate ISOLATION mode. I use it in Informix and SQLSERVER and
I am very happy with these products (atleast on this count) which gives
me the flexibility.
> My concern is that while some might use this as you describe ... others
> could just as easily produce invalid reports. There is no protection in
> the system to protect the end-user. How do they know?
well, I am using ur own words of wisdon. Learn to work in SQLSERVER as
it is suppose to work, not like Oracle :-). I expect SQLSERVER developrs
to have an understanding of ISOLATION level.
rk- |