Re: Performance Tuning for Row-by-Row Update Statement Is the row-by-row processing done in a cursor? Must you update exactly one
row at a time (if so, why?) or would it be acceptable to update 2,3 or 50
rows at a time?
You can use SET ROWCOUNT and a loop to fine-tune the batch size of rows to
be updated. Bigger batches should improve performance over updating single
rows.
SET ROWCOUNT 50
WHILE 1=1
BEGIN
UPDATE SomeTable
SET ...
WHERE /* row not already updated */
IF @@ROWCOUNT=0
BREAK
END
SET ROWCOUNT 0
--
David Portas
SQL Server MVP
-- |