Thread: eternal lock?
View Single Post

   
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-29-2008, 07:28 PM
Marco van de Voort
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: eternal lock?

On 2006-05-23, Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> wrote:
> Marco van de Voort (marcov@stack.nl) writes:
>>> To wit, if a query times out, and there is a transaction in progress,
>>> the transaction is not rolled back automatically. It is irrelevant
>>> whether the transaction was started prior to the submission of the
>>> query batch, or started within the query batch that timed out.
>>>
>>> The application must handle this by submitting
>>>
>>> IF @@trancount > 0 ROLLBACK TRANSACTION

>>
>> I call the rollback of the relevant ADO connection on the exception caused
>> by the timeout.


(for the record: I already did this all the time, it is not a change)

> So, did you investiagate if you have any blocking?


It occurs less than once a month (unfortunately on a painful moment). IOW, I
can't reproduce it at will. Which is why I asked if sb recognized the
problems.

> Also, I have you examined the SQL Server error log?


Yes, nothing. But maybe my logging settings are wrong.

Reply With Quote