On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:21:31PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:07:47AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 11:47:26AM +0300, WireSpot wrote:
> > > But... will the resulting dump be consistent as far as foreign
> > > keys are concerned? Or will the current -t warning still apply
> > > (YMMV as to the consistency of the resulting dump)?
> >
> > I think the latter is better. This is solidly in the realm of
> > prying off cover plates, and the warning is already there
>
> I think it would be good to include an option that only does
> checking and doesn't actually try to dump anything. That would make
> it easier to ensure your config file is correct.

Could you flesh this out a bit? What would this option produce in the
(imho most common) case where dependencies weren't all taken care of?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match