On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 13:05 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:

> How close do your PITR patches take us to Oracle's "Standby Databases"?
> I'm trying to decide whether it's a "major features" for PR purposes or
> not.

That was pretty much the sweet spot I was aiming at. Many databases
support such functionality.

Oracle supports five gradations of functionality, of which we hit first
two. There is a sixth level also, which we can hit using Hannu's ideas
but thats a roll-your own for now.

It would be fair to say that we may support Standby Databases with
asynchronous log file shipping.

[I have an outstanding question on how to include LWlock support into
the archiver, required to flesh out the feature set, and of course
assuming these patches being accepted.]

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq