On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:13:34PM +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> that hints that setting ERANGE on an underflow (vs an overflow) is
> implementation specific though I ws unable to verify that this is indeed
> the case ...

Odd, according to these references:

http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au/programmi...ry.html#stdlib
http://cplus.kompf.de/cliblist.html
http://docs.hp.com/en/B9106-90010/strtod.3C.html

returning ERANGE on underflow was in the ANSI C standard.

Can't find the text itself though,

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE/zuMIB7bNG8LQkwRAsNjAJ9f2zI9SjksrpeqaOtldy9qVmyYXwC eN5l6
iq47rEIVSzllu/djX+m8+H0=
=3VxC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----