Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> That's a good point. So, do we want/need the same for MBCS and ECPG tests?

It would be nice for ECPG. I wasn't even aware of the MBCS stuff - if it
will exercise the unicode sorting which is a little different on Windows
iirc (due to the lack of full native UTF-8 support) it might be a useful
addition, but I wouldn't say it was worth busting a gut over.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match