View Single Post

   
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 09:54 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> If we apply Heikki's idea of advancing OldestXmin, I think what we
> should do is grab the value from pgstats when vacuum starts, and each
> time we're going to advance OldestXmin, grab the value from pgstats
> again; accumulate the differences from the various pgstat grabs. At the
> end we send the accumulated differences as the new dead tuple count.


Considering that each of those values will be up to half a second old,
I can hardly think that this will accomplish anything except to
introduce a great deal of noise ...

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Reply With Quote