View Single Post

   
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:35 PM
Gregory Stark
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: CommandCounterIncrement versus plan caching

"Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:

> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
>> I think this can be fixed by changing the Executor so that it doesn't
>> use snapshot->curcid for this purpose. Instead, add a field to EState
>> showing the CommandID to mark tuples with. ExecutorStart, which has
>> enough information to know whether the query is read-only or not,
>> can set this field, or not, and tell GetCurrentCommandId to mark the
>> command ID "dirty" (or not).

>
> ExecutorStart could also determine when the query is a "write-only" query for
> which the provided command id won't be used for any snapshot checks (ie, a
> simple INSERT) and tell CCI not to bump the CCI if the previous CC even if
> it's dirty.


oops, garbled that. "tell CCI not to bump the counter even if it's dirty"q


--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply With Quote