Vadim Nasardinov <vadimn@redhat.com> writes:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>> It might be worthwhile having commit() throw an exception if the
>> transaction did not actually commit, rather than only reporting
>> server-generated errors. What do people think?

> Sounds like a good idea.

Doesn't the JDBC spec have anything to say about what this should do?

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster