View Single Post

   
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 11:19 PM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [BUGS] BUG #1588: pg_autovacuum sleep parameter overflow

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> However, I am now wondering if we should change pg_usleep() to take a
> double rather than long. This would avoid such problems in the future
> in other places in our code.


I'd leave it alone; there aren't any other places that need long sleeps,
and I don't really expect them. When and if we have a real need for it,
we can change it.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply With Quote