On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a
> more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?

I'd rather see something akin to PL/pgSQL's RETURN NEXT or PL/Perl's
return_next.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match