Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Or we could switch to a more compact representation of the dead tuples,
> and not need such a big maintenance_work_mem in the first place.

Hm, you got any ideas? One constraint is that it doesn't seem
acceptable to make the search function any slower.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster