Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> Added to TODO:
> >> o Add ability to obfuscate function bodies
>
> > For the record. I think this todo is bogus.
>
> For the record, I think so too ;-). The agreed-on TODO wording makes no
> mention of what an acceptable implementation would look like, and that's
> because there very possibly *is* no generally-acceptable implementation.
> (Though if someone has a bright new idea, I'm sure we'd all listen.)
> The point of the TODO entry is just to acknowledge that this is an issue
> for some folk, and that a real solution would be welcomed.

We could list it as a feature we don't want, but I don't think that is
accurate.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches