am Wed, dem 23.04.2008, um 9:23:07 +0200 mailte Hans Ekbrand folgendes:
> I cannot understand why the following two queries differ so much in execution time (almost ten times)

wild guess: different execution plans.


Can you show us the plans? (EXPLAIN ANALYSE SELECT ...)

>
> Query A (two queries)
>
> select distinct moment.mid from moment,timecard where parent = 45 and (pid=17 and timecard.mid = moment.mid) order by moment.mid;
> select distinct moment.mid from moment,timecard where parent = 45 and (pbar = 0) order by moment.mid;
>
> Query B (combining the two with OR)
>
> select distinct moment.mid from moment,timecard where parent = 45 and ((pid=17 and timecard.mid = moment.mid) or (pbar = 0)) order by moment.mid;
>
> [ snip ]
>
> I should say that this is on postgresql 7.4.16 (debian stable).

Uhh. Why not a recent version? We have 8.3.0...


>
> Can query B be rewritten so that it would execute faster?

Quick and dirty: use both selects (query A) combined with UNION.

I guess, with a recent version the planner can use a bitmap index scan
to perform Query B faster.


Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt: Heynitz: 035242/47150, D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID: 0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance