>
>> The only thing I have against OBSD (if regular use is considered) is IO
>> efficiency- it is really sloooow.
>
> Really? From what outhouse wall did you read that?

From www.openbsd.org? Or maybe from the wallpainting which says:
synchronous filesystems are ALWAYS slower though recommended by OBSD team?
Cant remember.
>
>> And smaller thing: CPU scalability is far behind Linux kernel.
>
> How many CPUs do you require to build a firewall? A 486DX2 will handle
> 10 Mbit/sec IP traffic at 10% CPU utilization.

I mentioned facts and limits. So whats your point?

>
>> PS. God bless ed, if you install OBSD from floppy you will know what I
>> mean
>
> Really, with the install sets on a server the entire OS goes onto HDD in
> less than 5 minutes. Makes me fall to sleep waiting.
>
Good for you. Not all install goes from a cutting edge disk and server- in
OBSD usually it's oposite, which you should know as an experienced OBSD
admin/user/expert pretty aware of hardware compatibility issues.

--
luk