On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Muhlestein
<djmuhlestein@gmail.com> wrote:

> Those are good points. So you'd go ahead and add the pgpool in front (or
> another redundancy approach, but then use raid1,5 or perhaps 10 on each
> server?

That's what I'd do. specificall RAID10 for small to medium drive sets
used for transactional stuff, and RAID6 for very large reporting
databases that are mostly read.

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance