Re: Questions regarding a PANIC situation
"adamsville2k" <adamsville2k@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4d70ebe3-97d6-4473-bd34-9d80dd47d0df@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On 9 mai, 08:41, Andrew Smallshaw <andr...@sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
> On 2008-05-09, adamsville2k <adamsvill...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Last week, we experienced 2 KERNEL PANIC error on our SCO Unix 5.0.7
> > server within a 2 hour span. So I called our sofware support which is
> > OGC using running on an Informix Database. Within 5 minutes I had as
> > answer that the problem was an Hardware issue. Since the server is
> > supported by another supplier, I then called them. They told me that
> > such of a problem could be software as well. Not only hardware like
> > the SCO site posts here.
>
> More details would have been appropriate here - you usually have
> some indication of the source of the panic. However, the source
> is unlikely to be your application, unless possibly it is doing
> something nasty with raw memory via /dev/mem or something of that
> sort. Put simply, your application shouldn't be able to make the
> OS panic. It should reject any invalid requests made by system
> calls etc cleanly and without threatening the integrity of the
> system. This is generally what happens in reality. To do otherwise
> would be a security flaw in that it would present a potential DoS
> vector.
>
> So the source of the panic is somewhere within the OS kernel itself
> which doesn't have the same level of protection as userland
> applications. OSR507 itself is generally fairly stable and so I
> would tend to agree with your application provider that this is
> probably a hardware issue. Kernel mode drivers typically have
> limited error recovery built in to them but this is designed for
> errors in normally functioning kit. Since you can't in general
> anticipate what problems defective kit might throw up the drivers
> don't attempt to and panic if things get too confusing.
>
> --
> Andrew Smallshaw
> andr...@sdf.lonestar.org
Thanks Andrew for replying. I know that there is few details here but
the point is to find out who's wrong and who's right! So if "software"
means SCO OS alone, it's fine to me. I just want ot make sure that
applications don't make the KERNEL to panic.
Adamsville2k
Ok, let's look at this logically. Has your application EVER caused the
system to 'panic' trap? My guess is 'NO'. Therefore, it is only logical to
look elsewhere. Most times, when we experience panics, it's the direct
result of something else having occurred ...... either the hardware has
malfunctioned, someone has changed something in the OS, or maybe the lights
flickered a few times. Like the others, there really isn't enough
information here to make a sound decision on just what caused the panic, but
it would be prudent to start looking at your hardware and make dead sure you
have adequately backed up the important files. Kernel panics have a nasty
habit of crashing systems.
JP |