In article <619bcf8.0306241752.79cf2d88@posting.google.com> , walterbyrd wrote:
> I know openbsd is supposed to more secure than other OSS offerings.
> But I'm not sure why. What features are in openbsd that are not in
> linux or freebsd?
Read the FAQ.

On 2008-06-06, YANSWBVCG <daf@puf2.localhost.comcast.net> wrote:
> As a long-time user of OpenBSD, I would say that OpenBSD is more secure
> than other operating systems IF YOU DON'T USE X; otherwise the system
> seems to have a backdoor that permits AMD64 systems to be compromised.
Could you please show some proof to back up your statements?

> I am unable to run KDE on OpenBSD 4.3 after upgrading from 4.2.
What does this got to do with security? Not to mention that you propably
screwed up the upgrade.

--
bulibuta@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org