OFF-TOPIC:

The whole thing reminds me of stories like "M$-Windows 4.00 and 4.10
(9x/SE/ME) does NOT depend on ANY DOS.
Or - years later - then: "OK, it actually does. But it needs to be
genuine MS-DOS 7.00A or higher.

*lol*
Caldera proved the total opposite in 1999.
See
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/netw.../schulman.html


" We also studied the ways in which the Windows 4.x components of
Windows 95 and Windows 98 are tied to the MS-DOS 7.x components, while
engineers at Caldera were working on a demo program called "WinBolt"
(see Seattle Weekly, Sept. 17, 1998) that allowed the Windows 4.x
components to run on DR DOS instead of MS-DOS."



http://www.google.com/search?hl=de&q...le-Suche&meta=

Martin