On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Tim Bradshaw wrote:

> It's a strange world where people can describe the type 5 as "high quality".
> I mean, I'm sure that relatively speaking it is, but we should have some
> values here: the type 3 was high quality, anything later is basically
> more-or-less shoddy crap, just slightly less shoddy than most.

Horses for course, I guess. I can only just remember the Type 3; I have
a Type 4 here, and it's OK. But from Type 4 -> Type 7, the Type 5c is
my favourite. (I think the Tyep 5 mouse is best, too.)

--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich