Lenard <lenard@127.0.0.1> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.02.01.21.04.46.789039@127.0.0.1>...
> begin On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:14:34 -0800, Google Mike typed:
>
> > I tried to Google help to eliminate the confusion and find someone who
> > has successfully moved to Kernel 2.6 without much fuss on RH9. The web
> > search was fruitless and led to dead ends. No one answered in
> > comp.os.linux.redhat, after a few days, so I'm trying here.
>
> Say what?!!!
>
> Subject: 2.6 kernel, fairly stable RPM, desired for RH9 From:
> googlemike@hotpop.com (Google Mike) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.redhat
> Date: 1 Feb 2004 06:52:25 -0800
>
> Subject: Re: 2.6 kernel, fairly stable RPM, desired for RH9 From:
> Keith Clark <clarkphotography@hotmail.com> Reply-To:
> clarkphotography@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.redhat
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) Date: Sun,
> 01 Feb 2004 17:07:33 GMT
>
> Subject: Re: 2.6 kernel, fairly stable RPM, desired for RH9 From:
> Lenard <lenard@127.0.0.1> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.redhat
> User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) Date:
> Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:15:48 GMT

The strangest thing, Lenard -- this initially didn't appear on Google
Groups on the dates it says it posted. I've seen this issue rarely
before. After you mentioned this, I went back and voila these were
there. Thanks for pointing this out to me.