Google Mike wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann <Peter.Koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote in message
>> Google Mike wrote:
>>
>> > I tried to Google help to eliminate the confusion and find someone who
>> > has successfully moved to Kernel 2.6 without much fuss on RH9. The web
>> > search was fruitless and led to dead ends. No one answered in
>> > comp.os.linux.redhat, after a few days, so I'm trying here.
>>
>> Fine. You have any reason why you absolutely *must* have 2.6?
>
> 1) Speed. I've heard of major improvements in speed between 2.4 and
> 2.6.

Good. Then wait until it is in your distro. Or learn how to compile it

> 2) Curiosity. Seems there's a lot of chatter about 2.6 and I wanted to
> be up to speed on it, not left in the dark. I'm always finding I'm
> left in the dark too much on cool Linux news and am like the last to
> hear about it.

"Left in the dark"? Kidding, are you? Applies to wintendo, not to linux
--
Windows was created to keep stupid people away from UNIX."
**--*Tom*Christiansen