Amarnaut Chedda wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:56:42 +0000, 7 wrote:
>
>> Amarnaut Chedda wrote:
>>
>>> Why is Suse 9.s so slow compared to Mandrake 10.1?
>>> I migrated from Mandrake to Suse because I had heard good things about
>>> it but my experience is the oppposite, suse is very slow and seems to be
>>> riddled with bugs.
>>> I am greatful for one thing and that is I didn't pay anything for this
>>> garbage.
>>> Suse should forget about trying to be everything to everyone and at
>>> least release a version of Linux that works.
>>> Back to Mandrake for me.
>>> Chedda
>>
>> Dear flat fish,
>> Try pre-linking for speed.
>> The problem is that you need to be replaced by a trained techie.
>> Please resign and let management choose better staff to replace you.
>
> I am not understanding you. How does your answer explain why Mandrake is
> so much faster than Suse. I did not do a thing to Mandrake, or Suse for
> that matter. What is a flatfish?

Signorita, flat fish is a fishy meal served flat side up with tartar sauce.

Yum yum.

No I can't supply you with information about Mandrake v. Suse unless you
post some test results like how long it took to copy a 100Mb file for
instance.