jw <jesswalton37@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > What rpm? For what target distro? Anyway - you downloaded an rpm that
> > needs a certain set of support libraries. EIther change your support
> > libraries or change the rpm you downloaded. This is the first time you
> > have mentioned an rpm, no?

> > Eh? A wrapper can be most anything. It's a loose term. You can write
> > a script wrapper for realplayer that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to wherever
> > you have stashed the support libs you need, then calls realplay. What's
> > the idea? Why not get an rpm aimed at your platform instead? Or simply
> > put the libs out in the open in your system? They don't do any harm.
> > libstdc++.so.5 looks to me on my platform to be part of generic old c++
> > back-support. You should be able to fix your problem by simply getting
> > an rpm aimed at your own libraries instead!
> >
> > More data on your part would enable us to perceive more accurately what
> > your problem is.


> It seems to me that your not trying to percieve anything. However it is
> quite clear that you enjoy responding to these posts because it does
> something for your ego.

Eh?

> Your by no means required to respond to any post. If you find the post
> is beneath your intellectual level it would probably be best for you as
> well as others if you just kept your responses to yourself.

What the heck is the matter with you?

Peter