In article <2JadnW9oLpUfbs3YnZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@forethought.net> ,
Daniel Packman <pack@users.forethought.net> wrote:
>In article <eiqq1q$l7c$1@hubcap.clemson.edu>,
>hubcap <hubcap@clemson.edu> wrote:
>>pack@users.forethought.net (Daniel Packman) writes:
>>>I just updated an ancient system to 5.3 and would like to
>>>take advantage of newer parts of the OS. As I understand it,
>>>pam is now fully supported in the OS. I haven't been able to
>>>find a particular fileset for this. Is is on the 8 cd V5.3
>>>release or somewhere else?
>>
>>PAM's supposed to be "all there" now, but there's something
>>busted in the framework where things marked "sufficient" in
>>the password part of pam.conf don't work at all. The problem
>>is easy to reproduce by just changing "required" to "sufficient"
>>in the single password line in the default pam.conf. Apparently
>>the framework gets the OK back from the prelim check and thinks
>>everything's all done...
>
>Thanks for the heads up, but what is the fileset I should
>look for and where might it be hiding?


Just to follow up a bit here...
The file /etc/pam.conf and other pam files are
in the fileset bos.rte.security.