View Single Post

   
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 06:57 AM
Keith Keller
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Labeling of partitions unclear

On 2008-02-08, Tom Newton <tom@server.invalid> wrote:
>
> That's the sort of cheap shot that people take when they don't want
> to honestly debate issues that someone raises.
>
> Attack their worth as a human being by assigning a perjorative label
> to them.


Like "Windows Weenie"? I guess you don't want to honestly debate issues
that have been raised in this thread.

> Anyone reduced to such infantile and dishonest tactics is _obviously_
> on the wrong path.


By this definition you've been on the wrong path since you first started
trolling alt.os.linux.slackware.

Just so this post isn't completely useless, the old fdisk man page
suggested using the partitioning tools in this order: cfdisk, fdisk,
sfdisk, and suggests that the only reason to use fdisk before sfdisk is
that sfdisk's UI sucks (which is true), and otherwise it makes better
partition tables. More recent man pages suggest parted, fdisk, sfdisk,
presumably due to parted being the only common partitioner that supports
GPT.

--keith

--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

Reply With Quote