Re: More examples of SCO's stunning competence (NOT!) In article <i0dcrvcgel6299g59s623qu4h5ko2qm1o5@4ax.com>,
JamesDad <mewnewsARROGANCE@mailandnews.com> wrote:
>Plus there's the matter of a *nix company using a Windows word
>processor to edit HTML. I'd say SCO's credibility as a company
>just dropped a couple of notches with me, but I don't know if
>they have that many left. :-)
That argument has been used against others - and it's not a real
argument. A couple of years ago there was a big bruhaha about
Sun using MS machines and MS products instead of the StarOffice.
MS products do run a vast majority of offices in the US and tyring
to hire someone who knows how to write documentation using
nroff/troff and the associated macros is pretty hard - unless they
are retired Bell employees who used to write manuals there.
Bill Campbell posted a story [here on in another NG/list]about a
woman in an office where his wife worked [as I recall] who was so
much more efficient that the others they had to find out why she
was so productive.
It turns out she did all her work in vi and then just imported into
Word.
--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com |