On 4 Jan 2004 14:57:51 -0800, Linolil wrote:

> My question: What could have been so "special" about 10.200.201.15
> to cause it to fail in that manner?

It could have been one of the configured networks' broadcast
address (see ifconfig output), that would cause the quoted
error (while pf doesn't, it may only create a 'No route to
host' error).

Daniel