"sh4d03" <sh4d03@TPG.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:41672486$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> subnet 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> The file WAS changed and gave these different errors:

Uh, ehm, I didn't notice your _that unfamiliar...so
192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 is an ip/netmask pair, inserted into dhcpd.conf it
results into:
subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
and not double-defined
subnet 192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {

next step will probably be to promote a router's address participating that
subnet, best practice would be to call it 192.168.2.1, and - of course - the
router should be there if you ever want to look outside your subnet.