In comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, William Ahern wrote:

> > > It's not open source (at least, not yet), but SUn's compiler are great.
> > > The potential downside is that they're Solaris based (which is now free).
> >
> > Are you talking about the CDDL? Have you read it?

> How on Earth could you infer that I was?! But yes, I've read the CDDL.
> In fact, as a member of the open source pilot, I was one of the people
> outside of SUn who was in a position give them feedback about it.
>
> This is a discussion about the availability of compilers, not licenses.

I think what the discussion was about is not exactly agreed upon. I was
speaking to the OP wishing to ship with different libraries.

In any event, I suppose statically linking w/ LGPL libraries was the real
issue and I missed the boat.