"Dave Uhring" <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote in message
newsan.2006.06.27.23.02.28.277314@yahoo.com...
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:01:22 +0100, Steve at fivetrees wrote:
>
>> "Dave Uhring" <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> newsan.2006.06.27.17.50.42.251471@yahoo.com...
>
>>> You must be new here.
>>
>> I'm not, and I agree with him. Quite unnecessary.
>
> Then you have failed to read the article posted by "sam" on c.u.b.f.misc.
>
> Message-ID: <WL2og.3816$b6.90550@nasal.pacific.net.au>
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a freebsd gateway in my client site connected to few windows
> machines. In this freebsd gateway, if I want to find out a windows
> computer name, what command/program I can use to do that? There is no
> samba install in this gateway.
>
>
> Now compare that article to the OP in this NG:
>
> Message-ID: <uM2og.3817$b6.90504@nasal.pacific.net.au>
>
> Hi,
>
> There is a obsd gateway in my client site connected to few windows
> machines. In this obsd gateway, if I want to find out a windows computer
> name, what command/program I can use to do that? There is no samba
> install in this gateway.
>
>
> "sam" does not even use OpenBSD:
>
> Message-ID: <6Jrkg.3307$b6.81613@nasal.pacific.net.au>
>
> Hi, I remember when I used OpenBSD 2.8 6 years ago, it was not stable
> when the system under heavy traffic load. I wonder whether this had been
> completely improved to match FreeBSD performance? Had its kernel
> completely rewritten based on FreeBSD kernel source??

Perhaps in the first two messages he's speaking rhetorically? As in "let's
imagine I'm running an OpenBSD/FreeBSD machine etc...". And perhaps he's not
a native English speaker.

Or perhaps he's a troll. No matter. I still don't see the need for napalm.

YMMV.

Steve
http://www.fivetrees.com