On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:05:00 +0100, Peter van Oord van der Vlies wrote:

> I still had a swap on both disks so i use that one now and disabled the
> swap on raid0.
> It seems to work..

Glad you got things working.

> Here is the information you want(the fault and trace is below):

<snip>

> ...The crash:
>
> uvm_fault(0xd0821a20, 0xe9dbd00, 0, 1) -> e
> kernel: page fault trap, code=0
> Stopped at pmap_page_remove_86+0x125: movl 0(%eax,%edx,4),%eax
>
>
> show panic:
> the kernel did not panic
>
>
> trace:
> pmap_page_remove_86(d0cba46,d04b6474,8,246,d7fd738 a8) at
> pmap_page_remove_86+0x125
> uvm_vnp_terminate(d8135138,0,0,0,0,14,d81869d8,9) at uvm_vnp_terminate+0x36b
> uvm_attach(d8135138,0,b7,0,d7f4f89c) at uvn_attach+0x2d1
> uvmspace_free(d7f4f89c,6,d085f740) at uvmspace_free+0x10d
> uvm_exit(d7f3d87c,d038e561,8,286) at uvm_exit+0x1a
> reaper(d81869d8) at reaper+0x9a
> Bad frame pointer: 0xd0989eb8

Your snipped disklabels showed your IDE drives, but not your raid drives.
I am going to guess your problem was a swap partition config issue,
perhaps your raid disklabels have swap as the first partition, and there
is no offset?

Anyway, its just conjecture. You now have a working RAIDFrame system.
Congratulations!


--
Replying directly will get you locally blacklisted.
Change the address; use my first name in front of the @ if you want to
communicate privately.