Re: PGP protection -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:29:06 GMT, Alan Connor <zzzzzz@xxx.yyy> wrote:
>
>So you want to make sure that everyone knows for sure that this
>masterpiece came from you and not some other punk troll?
No, Alan, you stupid piece of toilet trash. I CHOSE to sign that post
because I CAN. This is alt.security.pgp remember asshole?
How many times does that little brain of yours need to be told.....a
PGP sig is a digital signature and does not constitute an illegal
sig. IT IS THERe TO VERIFY THE SENDER you twat!!!
>
>Brilliant. Or is the PGP sig a fake? You know as well as anyone
>else that maybe 1 person in 10,000 on the Usenet has the software
>to verify this sig.
If you bothered to come out of your little hole long enough, you may
realise that there's considerably more people than that using PGP.
Just because you are too stupid to understand the concepts of it all,
don't think everybody has your level of mental retardation.
>
>Killfiled for 90 days for an illegal sig. Put it in your headers.
Whatever you asshole. The sig's not illegal. I won't put it in the
headers. It's staying where it is and I'll sign everyone of my posts
from now on in the hope that you may permanently killfile me.
I'm afraid Alan, you are the weakest link (by a very long
shot)...............GOODBYE!!!
*plonk*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQEVAwUBP7EpRBnQJBJ8Dmw5AQH+Zwf+Pm65yTX2al/H8pYiB+WQlbsnAkxX71KZ
gkhmGX0iRctp4QOGPSXAYgo33OfPinsRZUPXCJzfCEiEYLt8hl yfF7hI/V8XsWLV
17pf56DQ1SLsEDMBTsG2BRp9n6nxkEb66KsCDYtOE++y84wxSx 0nRgLjtYKxJSIV
BXanad7PqNN+gmFJaDyHFUrNGZm5zPOBmn1RlSD2EMO3VtG+ko XuxTcjR4xZw8ux
CA/pTRzrEW02PEuD23nOxgkRnfDfUYrj3+OjGfFgp8vOF0SGvBtgM wApRkUfrlwP
jcKDM0PY98l/d5iWFDHety7EfOq8M64KmUX304GmACkchmb2zMPxnA==
=cMua
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |