/dev/rob0 wrote:

>
>
> You might want to look into udev, but the "it ain't broke" factor is
> not to be neglected.


Hallo... yes... you're right...the "if it ain't broken" factor is not to be
neglected... so I'm not going to break this rule...

Where is 'udev'?

bye

------------------------
Italian Slack 9.1 user, Kernel 2.4.26 / 2.6.7