-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.os.linux.slackware, BenneJezzerette dared to utter,
>> I need install slackware 10.1 , but my cfdisk cannot open disk drive. I
>> have 2 SATA disks.
>>
> did you have a successful install?

Please pay attention. "I need install slackware 10.1". Obviously he
hasn't installed it yet.

> Suggesations use the reiserfs and the
> jfs.s kernel, this will help you.

This is the second time you recomended some one use reiserfs for a
partition and jfs.s as their kernel. I didn't call bullshit the first
time, because a diff on the configs for bare.i and jfs.s showed SCSI
support for the AIC7xxx series and the user in question was using an
unspecified Adaptec card, but this time I absolutley have to. Here is
a simple diff listing the changes.

alan@carrier:/home/slackware/slackware-10.1/kernels$ diff bare.i/config
jfs.s/config
566c566
< CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX=m
- ---
> CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX=y
582,585d581
< CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX_OLD=m
< # CONFIG_AIC7XXX_OLD_TCQ_ON_BY_DEFAULT is not set
< CONFIG_AIC7XXX_OLD_CMDS_PER_DEVICE=8
< # CONFIG_AIC7XXX_OLD_PROC_STATS is not set
1548c1544
< CONFIG_JFS_FS=m
- ---
> CONFIG_JFS_FS=y

So in other words, aside from supporting _one_ additional piece of
hardware and the JFS filesystem, jfs.s is identical to bare.i. Now
tell me, why in Bob's name would you recomend some one use the jfs.s
kernel and reiserfs?

- --
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCVS0vvgVcFKpJf4gRAmiTAKCTOE72TlEHzyxIwwmFOx 6SvPdRMgCgkjM9
9f4H08CWhbOzzKUPdLnRIUA=
=3HG0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----