On 2007-10-10, Res <res@ausics.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Keith Keller wrote:
>
>>> If you are going to spam that an MTA is better,
>>
>> I see no mention in Alan's post about postfix being better than any
>> other MTA.
>>
>
> IMHO thats what he was doing, the OP says he is using MTA a, why
> should anyone say 'check out MTA b', its like posting on this list and
> saying we should check out SuSE or fuckdora.

Not really, but you're welcome to your own opinion. Some software is
more suited to certain environments. Some people just grok some
software better than others. I certainly wouldn't claim that postfix is
better than sendmail (or vice versa), but I understand postfix better
than sendmail. Other admins understand sendmail better. The person who
said he's using MTA a might try MTA b and decide for himself which he
prefers.

--keith



--
kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information