Nuno J. Silva (aka NJSG) <nunojsg@gmail.com> wrote:
> A 24-06-2006 23:03, Arthur Hagen escreveu:
>>
>> For those not using a newsreader that auto-extracts the attachments
>> and presents those that are viewable (like your client does), the
>> user either has to look at the source or save the attachments and
>> look at them that way.
>> Of course, feel free to do it this way, but it may limit the number
>> of people who'll actually read the post.
>
> I'm sorry. I think that's happening because I'm using PGP-MIME.
>
> Maybe I'd be better off deactivating it (like I'm doing now with this
> post).

Much better! Although the signing still messes up your .sig, which by
convention and RFCs are recommended to be preceded by "-- " and not "- --".
If using "-- ", clients who support it can snip your sig when replying, or
display it differently when reading. No biggie, but I believe it's enigmail
doing this too.
Any need for PGP-signing your posts, except that the functionality is there?
:-)

> What newsreader are you using?

That depends -- if on my laptop, I use Evolution, if on a server, I use pine
or trn, and if on my work PC, I have to use Outlook Express (folks, don't
slam others for using OE, cause sometimes they don't have a choice). And in
rare cases I use telnet to port 119 on my news server. :-)

Regards,
--
*Art