Paul Landay <landay@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:<40CDBB43.75E0524C@us.ibm.com>...
> Don Davis wrote:
> >
> > Recently upgraded from 4.3.3ML-11 to Aix 5.2ML-02
> > Everything running fine, all apps are ok, no errors.
> > Here is the output from the lppchk command, and output from
> > the lslpp command, for bos.rte
> > I don't understand why lppchk would indicate inconsistent state, given
> > the output of lslpp.
> > Any comments welcome.
> >
> > (/home/wdd) # lppchk -v
> > lppchk: The following filesets need to be installed or corrected to
> > bring
> > the system to a consistent state:
> >
> > bos.rte v<5 (not installed; requisite
> > fileset)
> >


> > (/home/wdd) # lslpp -L |grep bos.rte |grep Runtime
> > bos.rte 5.2.0.12 C F Base Operating
> > System Runtime
> >
> > I can't imagine bos.rte is hosed, given all apps on system running
> > perfectly.
>
> It isn't bos.rte that is hosed.
> The problem is that you have another fileset installed
> which has an explicity pre-req for "bos.rte v<5". Note
> the "v<5" which means it wants to see bos.rte at a level
> less than version 5. This may be some package which is
> only supposed to run on AIX v4. I think the command:
> lslpp -p all
> will show you which fileset is looking for bos.rte <5.
>
> Paul Landay




must be this:

xlC.rte 6.0.0.0 At least 1 of the following must be installed {
At least 3 of the following must be installed {
*prereq bos.rte v<5
*prereq bos.rte v=4 r=3
*prereq xlC.aix43.rte 6.0.0.0
}
At least 2 of the following must be installed {
*prereq bos.rte v=5 r=0
*prereq xlC.aix50.rte 6.0.0.0

lslpp shows:

(/home/wdd) # lslpp -L |grep xlC
xlC.aix50.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime for AIX 5.0
xlC.cpp 5.0.2.0 C F C for AIX Preprocessor
xlC.msg.en_US.cpp 5.0.2.0 C F C for AIX Preprocessor
xlC.msg.en_US.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime
xlC.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime

Does aix 5.2 require different C compiler than aix 4.3.3?