Don Davis wrote:
> Paul Landay <landay@us.ibm.com> wrote in message news:<40CDBB43.75E0524C@us.ibm.com>...
>
>>Don Davis wrote:
>>
>>>Recently upgraded from 4.3.3ML-11 to Aix 5.2ML-02
>>>Everything running fine, all apps are ok, no errors.
>>>Here is the output from the lppchk command, and output from
>>>the lslpp command, for bos.rte
>>>I don't understand why lppchk would indicate inconsistent state, given
>>>the output of lslpp.
>>>Any comments welcome.
>>>
>>>(/home/wdd) # lppchk -v
>>>lppchk: The following filesets need to be installed or corrected to
>>>bring
>>> the system to a consistent state:
>>>
>>> bos.rte v<5 (not installed; requisite
>>>fileset)
>>>
>
>
>
>>>(/home/wdd) # lslpp -L |grep bos.rte |grep Runtime
>>> bos.rte 5.2.0.12 C F Base Operating
>>>System Runtime
>>>
>>>I can't imagine bos.rte is hosed, given all apps on system running
>>>perfectly.
>>
>>It isn't bos.rte that is hosed.
>>The problem is that you have another fileset installed
>>which has an explicity pre-req for "bos.rte v<5". Note
>>the "v<5" which means it wants to see bos.rte at a level
>>less than version 5. This may be some package which is
>>only supposed to run on AIX v4. I think the command:
>> lslpp -p all
>>will show you which fileset is looking for bos.rte <5.
>>
>>Paul Landay
>
>
>
>
>
> must be this:
>
> xlC.rte 6.0.0.0 At least 1 of the following must be installed {
> At least 3 of the following must be installed {
> *prereq bos.rte v<5
> *prereq bos.rte v=4 r=3
> *prereq xlC.aix43.rte 6.0.0.0
> }
> At least 2 of the following must be installed {
> *prereq bos.rte v=5 r=0
> *prereq xlC.aix50.rte 6.0.0.0
>
> lslpp shows:
>
> (/home/wdd) # lslpp -L |grep xlC
> xlC.aix50.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime for AIX 5.0
> xlC.cpp 5.0.2.0 C F C for AIX Preprocessor
> xlC.msg.en_US.cpp 5.0.2.0 C F C for AIX Preprocessor
> xlC.msg.en_US.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime
> xlC.rte 6.0.0.0 C F C Set ++ Runtime
>
> Does aix 5.2 require different C compiler than aix 4.3.3?

Well, sure it does. But what confuses me is that my memory says that 6
is the minimum required for 5.2 and is backwards compatable witht 4.3.3
(it was introduced while 4.3.3 was still under maintenance).

Have you applied the bundle of fixes for the C compiler? I don't have
an ML2 pile handy to see if they are included there, but my memory
(there it is again) says they are not.

Just a SWAG.