Thanks for the suggestions.
Sh
"Kevin Brooks" <kbrooks@sagetelecom.net> wrote in message
news:OitSnTFYDHA.2032@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Partition views can help here. You will be able to keep table sizes down
> and this can increase query times when done right. It sounds like you
moved
> multiple tables into one table. If this is the case you will need to
break
> them back out into smaller tables, add partitioning columns, modify
Primary
> Keys and build the view. That might be a hassle. I can query a 20million
> record table and get a response back in under a second, I just did a query
> on 250million and elasped time was 10sec(only one index on there, I know I
> could get quicker
). Did you change indexes for reporting or not?
>
>
> "Shamim" <shamim.abdul@railamerica.com> wrote in message
> news:#dGAN7EYDHA.2200@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > I am sorry, I meant PARTITIONED VIEWS
> >
> > Sh
> >
> > "Kevin Brooks" <kbrooks@sagetelecom.net> wrote in message
> > news:OPszDvEYDHA.2204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Indexed views are only really good for aggregations and joining data
> from
> > > mutiple tables, is this what you need to do??? Several of our tables
> are
> > > over a million rows in our production environment and it all comes
down
> to
> > > indexing. Did you create new indexes designed for queries or are they
> the
> > > existing indexes from the original tables?
> > >
> > >
> > > "Shamim" <shamim.abdul@railamerica.com> wrote in message
> > > news:#vojbnEYDHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > > > SQL SERVER 2K
> > > >
> > > > We have 30 databases each for one business units.
> > > > Now I am consolidating few tables from 30 databases to one database
> for
> > > > Analysis purpose.
> > > >
> > > > Now my tables in Central db have millions of records.
> > > > I need some tips to handle this huge tables for query purpose
(already
> > > > applied with all Indexes).
> > > >
> > > > Can I go with INDEXED VIEWS ??
> > > >
> > > > Thx
> > > > Sh
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>