Jens Kleikamp schrieb:
> hi to all,
>
> I have a simple question/szenario.
>
> Here are my tables:
>
> 1. image (id, name)
> 2. tag (id, name)
> 3. images_tags (image_id, tag_id)
>
> At the moment I have the following working query, it selects all images
> which have *at least one of the tag ids* (25,30) assigned.
>
> SELECT DISTINCT image.id, image.label
> FROM `image`
> JOIN `images_tags`
> ON image.id = images_tags.image_id && images_tags.tag_id IN (25,30)
>
>
> Now my plan is to adjust the query so that only images are selected
> which have *all the tags assigned*, so the IN command in the ON clause
> does not fit anymore. Here is my attempt to replace the IN:
>
>
> SELECT DISTINCT image.id, image.label
> FROM `image`
> JOIN `images_tags`
> ON image.id = images_tags.image_id &&
> (
> images_tags.tag_id = 25
> &&
> images_tags.tag_id = 30
> )
>
Solution #1:

SELECT fgl_image.id, fgl_image.label
FROM fgl_image, fgl_images_tags A, fgl_images_tags B
WHERE fgl_image.id = A.image_id
AND fgl_image.id = B.image_id
AND A.tag_id =10
AND B.tag_id =9

Solution #2:

SELECT fgl_image.id, fgl_image.label
FROM fgl_image
INNER JOIN fgl_images_tags ON fgl_images_tags.image_id = fgl_image.id
AND fgl_images_tags.tag_id
IN ( 10, 9 )
GROUP BY fgl_image.id, fgl_image.label
HAVING COUNT( * ) =2