PleegWat wrote:

> In article <4518fcd9$0$75040$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, alex says...
> > is this the normal behaviour? is there any other way in which those rows
> > where both fields are null are returned?
>
> In all of the various programming languages I've used so far that have
> null, it is valid that (null != null)

That's not exactly correct. In Java, for example, the comparison (null == null) equates to true. This applies to Progress also.

I haven't tested any other languages, as these were the two that I have available.

--