- Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
- Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
- Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions
- Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
- regarding storage in postgres
- ODBC
- audit facilities?
- NOLOGGING option, or ?
- Physical Tlist optimization still possible?
- Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
- =?windows-1251?B?ze7z8uHz6ugg4S/zIOjnINHYwCDu8iAzMDAgJCDxIOPg8ODt8ujl6SDiIMzu8eri? ==?windows-1251?B?5SAo7e7i++Ug7+7x8vPv6+Xt6P8p?=
- Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...
- Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...
- CREATE DATABASE fails when template1 being accessed ...
- ddl triggers
- Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives
- Re: [PATCHES] Adding \x escape processing to COPY, psql, backend
- Autoconf update?
- Fix for cross compilation
- Interval->day proposal
- Re: compiling postgres with Visual Age compiler on OpenPower5 / Linux
- Small change in LockAcquire API
- Simplifying unknown-literal handling
- pg_buffercache causes assertion failure
- Re: Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch
- compiling postgres with Visual Age compiler on OpenPower5 / Linux
- Escape handling in COPY, strings, psql
- Inefficiency in recent pgtz patch
- Bloom Filter indexes?
- Re: thw rewriter and default values, again
- Re: thw rewriter and default values, again
- INOUT/OUT problems with IMMUTABLE
- overlaps() does not work as expected?
- Re: logging sql from JDBC
- Multiple-statement Rules Incompatible With Constraints
- Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
- unsafe use of hash_search(... HASH_ENTER ...)
- A 2 phase commit weirdness
- Rod Taylor
- Regression failures: time, timetz, horology
- Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
- Re: Can we simplify win32 threading code
- foreign keys and RI triggers
- Can we simplify win32 threading code
- Josh Narins' Subcountry System
- adding a function to pg_proc.h
- Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
- Source Code Help Needed
- logging sql from JDBC
- WAL replay failure after file truncation(?)
- soundex and metaphone
- postmaster.pid disappeared
- IN/OUT parameters
- 8.0.x RPM issues
- Re: [SQL] ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. {}
- plpgsql trigger - does it auto-acquire a lock?
- Deadlocks in 7.4.x ...
- Obtaining Firing Statement clause in (pl/perlu) Trigger Function
- Speeding up the Postgres lexer
- Re: INSTEAD OF trigger on VIEWs
- INSTEAD OF trigger on VIEWs
- subquery returning array
- Re: Views update ?
- SO_KEEPALIVE
- Re: inet increment w/ int8
- Minor issues with bitmap
- Re: Allow change of kerberos service name without recompilation
- Re: [GENERAL] Image storage questions
- Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
- Re: Notification when freespaces empty
- Re: Notification when freespaces empty
- Inherited constraints and search paths (was Re: [GENERAL] Preserving data after updates)
- C array from SQL array?
- 8.02 rpm error
- Re: Bitmap scan cost model (was Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order)
- Re: Bitmap scan cost model (was Re: bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order)
- understanding bitmap index benefit
- Contributing
- Rationalizing SInval/PGPROC data structures and locking
- could not dump unrecognized node type: 500
- Two-phase commit issues
- Re: patches for items from TODO list
- Re: patches for items from TODO list
- pg_dump and using schema problem
- Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
- Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX
- Re: Ingres dump files to PostgreSQL
- Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
- Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
- SO_KEEPALIVE
- postgreSQL as deductive DBMS
- postgreSQL as deductive DBMS
- bitmap scans, btree scans, and tid order
- Re: [ADMIN] Permissions not removed when group dropped
- Planned change of ExecRestrPos API
- [Fwd: Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries]
- alternate regression dbs?
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: Do you have any objections on contributing your improvements of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
- PREPARE TRANSACTION and friends, separate node?
- Re: Do you have any objections on contributing your improvements of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
- Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
- Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
- Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- libpq lo_open errors when first action in connection
- PostgreSQL running out of file handles
- Best way to scan on-disk bitmaps
- Re: "Priority Mechanisms for OLTP and Transactional Web Applications"
- Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
- Re: implementing NOTIFY with message parameter
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: SQL_ASCII vs. 7-bit ASCII encodings
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: [ADMIN] how do i kill user sessions?
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- SQL_ASCII vs. 7-bit ASCII encodings
- patches for items from TODO list
- New Contrib Build?
- Understanding Rule System
- Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
- Re: [PATCHES] plperl and pltcl installcheck targets
- 7.3.10 working
- Server instrumentation for 8.1
- Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
- --enable-thread-safety?
- FW: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
- Adding callback support.
- Hashagg planning bug (8.0.1)
- Re: Case insensitive usernames
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
- Please clarify
- Re: Oracle Style packages on postgres
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Case insensitive usernames
- Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
- Its all re-packaged ...
- Table Partitioning, Part 1
- Re: Case insensitive usernames
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Table Partitioning, Part 1
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Case insensitive usernames
- Re: Can we get patents?
- Re-packaging releases ...
- Oracle Style packages on postgres
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: [PATCHES] Cleaning up unreferenced table files
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- why two WRITE_NODE_FIELD(whereCluase)?
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Will new release require an initdb?
- Re: [GENERAL] Invalid unicode in COPY problem
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Can we get patents?
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: [GENERAL] Invalid unicode in COPY problem
- Re: [GENERAL] Invalid unicode in COPY problem
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: [GENERAL] Invalid unicode in COPY problem
- Fix PID file location?
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Race conditions, race conditions!
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- Re: Patch for collation using ICU
- rendezvous
- unix_socket_directory bug or feature?
- Releases postponed till Monday
- CVS HEAD problem: psql: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libreadline.so.4:
- Re: Do you have any objections on contributing your improvements of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- State of Kerberos v4 support
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- FC3 broken with HEAD
- test bed
- Database properties not being duplicated
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- pl/pgsql enabled by default
- pgFoundry
- Proposed 'cleanup' of ftp ...
- Packages 7.2.8 thru 8.0.2 built ...
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- test, please ignore
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [ADMIN] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover?
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Re: 'infinity' in GiST index
- Re: [GENERAL] Interesting article on transactional algorithms includes
- Re: "Priority Mechanisms for OLTP and Transactional Web Applications"
- plpgsql SET OF functions in field list of select
- Re: Views, views, views! (long)
- Views, views, views! (long)
- 'infinity' in GiST index
- Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins
- Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries
- Re: "Priority Mechanisms for OLTP and Transactional Web Applications"
- FW: "Priority Mechanisms for OLTP and Transactional Web Applications"
- Re: "Priority Mechanisms for OLTP and Transactional Web Applications"
- Re: pg_locks needs a facelift
- pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
- Re: [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
- Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
- Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
- Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
- Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
- Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
- Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
- Bogus assertion in multixact.c?
- Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
- A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
- distributed database
- Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
- Re: pg_locks needs a facelift