This is a discussion on RE: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly? within the Debian Linux Users forum forums, part of the Debian Linux category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Fink [mailto:carlf@panix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:05 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Fink [mailto:carlf@panix.com] > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 8:05 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Firefox (Iceweasel) 3: is this page rendered horribly? > > I have 3.0~rc2-2 on my Testing system. This page: > > http://savethecracker.blogspot.com/ > > among others comes out as repetitive 1-inch graphical segments of various > parts of the page jumbled together. It's apparently a Gecko problem, > because Epiphany does the same thing now that I've got Iceweasel 3. > > Can anyone confirm? If so, I'll report it as a bug. > -- > Carl Fink nitpicking@nitpicking.com > > Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations! > Stupid mistakes you can correct! > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org > Running 3.0~rc2.2 on Debian Lenny (Testing) and the rendering looks good to me. Have fun! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite installing several upgrades? -- Carl Fink nitpicking@nitpicking.com Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations! Stupid mistakes you can correct! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 09:25, Carl Fink wrote: > OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both > Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? > > Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite > installing several upgrades? Maybe, if you use a display manager. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiArgkACgkQS9HxQb37XmcY1ACfX69FxWqRLd 8I6oTpoj4WH5eC E0cAn1ytHElK2B//xw9+Jgf8jkxlMyKD =ampB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both > Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't it? If you use an Intel integrated graphics card with XAA acceleration, try the XAANoOffscreenPixmaps workaround (see bug #482992). > Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite > installing several upgrades? To find out which services/processes need restarting after an upgrade, run lsof | grep "path inode" as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see bug #491235). -- Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote*: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:25:35 -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > > OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in > > both Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? > > Epiphany is also based on the Gecko rendering engine, isn't it? > > If you use an Intel integrated graphics card with XAA acceleration, try > the XAANoOffscreenPixmaps workaround (see bug #482992). > > > Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) > > despite installing several upgrades? > > To find out which services/processes need restarting after an upgrade, > run > > lsof | grep "path inode" > > as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The > checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same > thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see > bug #491235). > > -- > Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer > Florian | Thanks for the debian-goodies tip. It's really a very useful package. -- Thomas Preud'homme Why debian : http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : [snip] >> >> as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The >> checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same >> thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see >> bug #491235). >> >> -- >> Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer >> Florian | > > > Thanks for the debian-goodies tip. It's really a very useful package. I've been using it for quite a while now, but is it at all useful for non-daemons? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiA0OIACgkQS9HxQb37Xmc4rACcD4ckJ/dN83UP6IA772JqUNBu TTgAmQHYiC6VAr0lmbkvjZC0rLIa7KtS =AWZj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:20:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > > The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : > [snip] > >> > >> as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The > >> checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same > >> thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see > >> bug #491235). > > > Thanks for the debian-goodies tip. It's really a very useful package. > > I've been using it for quite a while now, but is it at all useful > for non-daemons? Besides the various system daemons, I often find that I have to restart X and services that were started in the X session (ssh-agent, gpg-agent, various KDE-related background processes). On occasion I additionally see login, bash and the ttys in the output of checkrestart. -- Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/18/08 15:12, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:20:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 07/18/08 11:50, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: >>> The Friday 18 July 2008 18:07:41 Florian Kulzer, you wrote : >> [snip] >>>> as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The >>>> checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same >>>> thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see >>>> bug #491235). >>> Thanks for the debian-goodies tip. It's really a very useful package. >> I've been using it for quite a while now, but is it at all useful >> for non-daemons? > > Besides the various system daemons, I often find that I have to restart > X and services that were started in the X session (ssh-agent, gpg-agent, > various KDE-related background processes). On occasion I additionally > see login, bash and the ttys in the output of checkrestart. Ah. I drop into the console to do major updates, so never see that stuff. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiBFnoACgkQS9HxQb37XmfpdQCfa0idqIG9dV eNQoPM+xOmTr8b gWwAn2yR9UIwOGQktMwHI0jXn+byhbzS =fwPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| Carl Fink wrote: >> >> as root. This should list all processes that hang on to stale files. The >> checkrestart command from "debian-goodies" is supposed to do the same >> thing more comfortably, but this does not work for me at the moment (see >> bug #491235). >> > > There were lots, and restarting X didn't free them. A restart fixed the > problem. > You mean rebooting? Thanks, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| ||||
| Carl Fink wrote: > OK, if the page looks fine to everyone else, why would it be wrong in both > Epiphany and Iceweasel on my box? > > Could it be that I've been reluctant to restart X (up for 74 days) despite > installing several upgrades? > That page looks fine here on IW3 but it still renders fonts too large on some other sites. Paul Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|