This is a discussion on Re: ??: Stunned by aptitude. within the Debian Linux Users forum forums, part of the Debian Linux category; --> Wackojacko wrote: > Steve Lamb wrote: >> Dovecot doesn't do sieve. > There is a plug-in for sieve. > ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Wackojacko wrote: > Steve Lamb wrote: >> Dovecot doesn't do sieve. > There is a plug-in for sieve. > http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve > HTH Hell yeah it helps. Hm, they're compiled in by default in Ubuntu, wonder if that means Debian too. Also... http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermai...ay/029069.html ...Wewt, TBird Sieve extensions! I know what I'm going to be playingwith this weekend! Thanks! Yes, I said wewt, for those who went all o.O at that, deal. :P -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIdw1STJCUEB/AEAQRAtGrAJ91f8suphSdXtIzSiZi6LR1uJvjRQCdHiHa Nfxx7gvpciF/yLKMb3Yzh7M= =1zvB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| Steve Lamb wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> Of course, it drops mails directly into Maildir folders, so you'd >> have to tell Dovcot to use Maildir instead of mbox. But that should >> not be hard. > > I was talking about the filters from the client more than the subfolders. > Dovecot doesn't do sieve. > There is a plug-in for sieve. http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve HTH Wackojacko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Steve C. Lamb wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:38:21AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >>> On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: >>> This is why IMAP should be the standard mail store, not mboxes in >>> "proprietary" locations. > >> second that. THe convenience is incredible. Case in point: > > Here's another fine example. I use dovecot on my server to > expose my mbox > mail via IMAP. Here are the locations from where I regularly check > my mail: We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-) Then you can back up mail directories with thinks like rdiff and not pull in the whole mbox file into the backup again. Just the new mail. (GRIN) -- Nate Duehr nate@natetech.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| Nate Duehr wrote: > We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-) > > Then you can back up mail directories with thinks like rdiff and not > pull in the whole mbox file into the backup again. Just the new > mail. (GRIN) While I do think Maildir is a lot better than mbox, applications like rsync, rdiff-backup, etc, copy only what's changed in files, so rsync'ing a mbox is actually efficient. -- Credit ... is the only enduring testimonial to man's confidence in man. -- James Blish Eduardo M KALINOWSKI eduardo@kalinowski.com.br http://move.to/hpkb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| Nate Duehr wrote: > We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-) Uh, no, thanks. I far prefer mbox's problems to maildir's. > Then you can back up mail directories with thinks like rdiff and not > pull in the whole mbox file into the backup again. Just the new mail. > (GRIN) Huh? You do realize that diff does work on individiual lines in a file so effectively no difference. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/12/08 18:46, Steve Lamb wrote: > Nate Duehr wrote: >> We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-) > > Uh, no, thanks. I far prefer mbox's problems to maildir's. Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history folders so directories never get above 10,000 files, but what problems do Maildirs have? Needing to open many files instead of one? I'll take that over an errant EOF wiping out a large chunk of a directory. Yes I can restore from backup, but (a) the bug that caused the errant EOF is still there, and (b) bringing back the back-up emails without introducing duplicates or overwriting new mails is a hassle. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh5UYoACgkQS9HxQb37XmfedgCgj1Giw2MhOj asrZaJuOadg//C Bg4An3BNE3J4bc+jdEqwbrGHCTGtrITZ =ogZ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| Ron Johnson wrote: > Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history > folders so directories never get above 10,000 files, but what > problems do Maildirs have? > Needing to open many files instead of one? Needing to deal with that many files in any capacity, ever. I've had the displeasure of being the administrator of a qmail setup that would accept all mail (smtp-time rejection, what's that!?) then filter then generate bounces to bogus email addresses in spam. Yeah, 50,000 maildir queues that take 20 minutes to stat are no fun. That pretty much swore me off that idiotic idea. > I'll take that over an errant EOF wiping out a large chunk of a > directory. Let's see. I've been using mbox since the early 90s with my first Netcom account and elm. Or was it late 80s? Anyway, let's just say about 15 years. In that time know how many EOF problems I've hit in all of my mail in 15 years? 0. I've had 2 hard drives take a nosedive on me in that time. Or not to put too fine a point on it, opening up one maildir directory with more than, say, 2000 messages in it will have wasted more time than I have ever had wasted by "errant EOFs". > Yes I can restore from backup, but > (a) the bug that caused the errant EOF is still there, and Or in my case, not. I guess you could say that the bug that caused my hard-drive to eat itself is still there... > (b) bringing back the back-up emails without introducing duplicates > or overwriting new mails is a hassle. Not so much any more. Pull out archives, merge, run "remove duplicates" tool, done. But then, I haven't had to do that, either, since when I lose my mail stores to hard drive failures I generally am no concerned about the "merge" portion. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/13/08 04:14, Steve Lamb wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history >> folders so directories never get above 10,000 files, but what >> problems do Maildirs have? > >> Needing to open many files instead of one? > > Needing to deal with that many files in any capacity, ever. I've > had the displeasure of being the administrator of a qmail setup that > would accept all mail (smtp-time rejection, what's that!?) then filter > then generate bounces to bogus email addresses in spam. Yeah, 50,000 > maildir queues that take 20 minutes to stat are no fun. That pretty > much swore me off that idiotic idea. That's qmail's fault, not that of Maildir. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh5/YEACgkQS9HxQb37Xmf82QCg0bYiBxwPJyucpoOKaIUKa1/b e0MAoKFaMi86RqVJ4h89jAxq7oM9tn/B =+cPj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| |||
| On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:35:46AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > Hell yeah it helps. Hm, they're compiled in by default in Ubuntu, wonder > if that means Debian too. Also... For the record it is compiled in on the Debian version of dovecot. > http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermai...ay/029069.html > ...Wewt, TBird Sieve extensions! I know what I'm going to be playing with > this weekend! Thanks! Unfortunately this is bare bones, the scripts need to be handwritten. I was hoping for an inteface similar to TBird's internal filtering. IE, something parent friendly. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org |
| ||||
| Hallo Jochen, Am 2008-07-14 00:31:03, schrieb Jochen Schulz: > I don't see a problem with several thousand files in one directory: Me too > # echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > > $ time ls -1 ~/Maildir/.debian.user/cur | wc -l > 10997 > > real 0m2.529s > user 0m0.284s > sys 0m0.332s > > $ du -hs ~/Maildir/.debian.user/cur > 87M . My "~/Maildir/.ML_devel.linux-kernel@vger_kernel_org/cur" has currently 153.000 messages with arround 3 GByte and even mutt open it localy in less then 4 minutes without "hcache" > The first line flushes the filesystem cache. Subsequent runs take about > 0.3 seconds. Filesystem is XFS on a 2.6.18 kernel from etch. It > shouldn't be significantly worse with ext3 (at least when it is created > with -O dir_index). I am using ext3 and used "tune2fs" to add the "dir_index" which increased the speed by faktor 6. I should note, that I am already using a Raid-1 with two 74 GByte SCA drives plus Hotfix of 15.000 RpM. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ##################### Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 +49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi +33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIf1KLC0FPBMSS+BIRAv+yAJ4iyS1y8Pa9YohSQA59tc RogAlaggCdEmaf GVOzjea51V5Oi6uL//zRWw4= =pdpB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |