Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
just an observation.

--
" If you can empty your mind of all thoughts your
heart will embrace the tranquility of peace.
Watch the workings of all of creation, but
contemplate their return to the source. "
-Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu-

ChrisC

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:

> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>> just an observation.
>
> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.

Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.

So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

Mark
--
Signature uses openbsd so as to be able to use mg

Mark South wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:
>
>> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>>> just an observation.
>> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.
>
> Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.

What kind of beer?
Here Jupiler is my favourite but you should all know Stella Artois,
sicne we keep the best and export the inferior ones...

> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

No man, but I must say Gentoo is a really good distribution and the
others are used by a bunch of tree huggin' hippie crap! :-p

> Mark

--
I'm sick of following my dreams!
I'll just ask where they're going and hook up with them later...

Mitch Hedberg

["Followup-To:" header set to alt.os.linux.debian.]

So anyway, it was like, 11:43 CET Dec 07 2007, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
Mark South was all like, "Dude,

> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

Yes.

--
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana. Perth ---> *
12:12:34 up 11 days, 20:25, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
Linux 2.6.23.8 x86_64 GNU/Linux Registered Linux user #261729

Wim Cossement wrote:
>
> What kind of beer?
> Here Jupiler is my favourite but you should all know Stella Artois,
> sicne we keep the best and export the inferior ones...
>
I thought you guys turned up your noses at anything except Trappist or
Abbaiale beers.

I was happy to drink Jupilier (especially in the Falstaff) when I was
working in Brussels but a Belgian friend classed anything that wasn't
Trappist or Abbaile as "industrial beer" and wouldn't touch it. I also
liked Chimay Bleu a lot.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Wim Cossement wrote:
>>
>> What kind of beer?
>> Here Jupiler is my favourite but you should all know Stella Artois,
>> sicne we keep the best and export the inferior ones...
>>
> I thought you guys turned up your noses at anything except Trappist or
> Abbaiale beers.

Not really, we like all of them... :-)

> I was happy to drink Jupilier (especially in the Falstaff) when I was
> working in Brussels but a Belgian friend classed anything that wasn't
> Trappist or Abbaile as "industrial beer" and wouldn't touch it. I also
> liked Chimay Bleu a lot.

Well thats a bit snobby if you ask me!
It's also the first time I'm confronted with such a point of view and I
must say that your friend is talking crap.

We don't look down upon industrially produced beers, only the quality of
the liquid matters (and taste is debatable...)
Some trappists and abbey beers are also produced on an industrial scale
you know.

And last but not least: if you go out and only drink Duvel, Chimaym or
Chimay Blue for instance you'll get quite fucked up in the end but with
normal beers it's easier to move larger quantities! :-p

Wimmy

On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:53:26 +0000, ChrisC <chrispche@nospam.googlemail.com>
wrote:

>Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>just an observation.

That has been my experience. KDE is .. flaky. For any job that requires a
computer to work 24 / 7, the clear choice is GNOME. KDE is pretty, and more
customizable .. and, I genuinely like KDE better, but GNOME is where I do my
work ..

On 7 Dec 2007 11:43:18 +0100, Mark South <mark.south@null.invalid> wrote:

>So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?

Such mystical, transcendental questions have no solution. It's like asking,
what is the value of pi?

Mark South wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:27:05 +0000, Dan C wrote:
>
>
>> On 2007-12-07, ChrisC wrote:
>>
>>> Does any one notice that KDE is less stable than Gnome. I find Gnome
>>> crashes less and is a lot more solid. This isn't Gnome Vs KDE debate,
>>> just an observation.
>>>
>> I'd score this a 1.25 (out of 10) on the Troll-O-Meter.
>>
>
> Trolls get weaker towards the weekend as their beer levels drop.
>
> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?
>
> Mark
>


vi is certainly easier to spell and type. ;-)


--
John

No Microsoft nor Apple products were used in the preparation or transmission of this message.

The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell me what I can't do. The GPL sounds like it was written by a human being, who wants me to know what I can do.

George Peatty wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2007 11:43:18 +0100, Mark South <mark.south@null.invalid> wrote:
>
>> So, did we ever definitively decide which is better, emacs or vi?
>
> Such mystical, transcendental questions have no solution. It's like asking,
> what is the value of pi?

That easy. It's three something