vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi all, I have a Debian mail server running postfix + amavisd-new and spamassassin. Configuration is almost the same as advocated on http://www.howtoforge.com/amavisd_postfix_debian_ubuntu, but I wasn't able to force amavisd to add a header to mails and to enable spam checking at all. Amavisd generally works: it checks incoming emails and moves banned contents to /var/lib/amavis/virusmails/ To force addition of a header I set $sa_tag_level_deflt = -999; in /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user But this setting doesn't change anything, i.e. no header gets added. Adjusting the loglevel in this file works (so this is the right file and the sa_tag_level_deflt is not overwritten by any other file from /etc/amavis/conf.d/ @bypass_spam_checks_acl is commented out. Any ideas what I'm missing here? Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Wilm | 0x7C68FBCC |
| ||||
| Just in case somebody runs into the same problem: Forgot to mention that this server serves multiple domains. As luck would have it, I only checked the headers from one of those domains. After adding the appropriate domains to local_domains_acl everything worked like a charm. Andreas Andreas Wilm wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a Debian mail server running postfix + amavisd-new and > spamassassin. Configuration is almost the same as advocated on > http://www.howtoforge.com/amavisd_postfix_debian_ubuntu, but I wasn't > able to force amavisd to add a header to mails and to enable spam > checking at all. > > Amavisd generally works: it checks incoming emails and moves banned > contents to /var/lib/amavis/virusmails/ > To force addition of a header I set > $sa_tag_level_deflt = -999; > in /etc/amavis/conf.d/50-user > But this setting doesn't change anything, i.e. no header gets added. > Adjusting the loglevel in this file works (so this is the right file > and the sa_tag_level_deflt is not overwritten by any other file from > /etc/amavis/conf.d/ > @bypass_spam_checks_acl is commented out. > > Any ideas what I'm missing here? > > Thanks, > Andreas > -- Andreas Wilm | 0x7C68FBCC |