vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| josh <tan2004@mts.net>: > all in one is brother better easier than hp to run? Try an Epson CX4800. Scanner, photocopier, and printer all work in CUPS environment. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. |
| |||
| Hi josh schrieb: > all in one is brother better easier than hp to run? I have a Brother MFC 410CN which I will throw away ASAP. In terms of features, size, ergonomy and price you can't beat that one, last year at least. The first problem was with the CUPS drivers. Brother provides a closed source driver as a rpm, which worked under SuSE. It sort of tweaks and replaces original components in CUPS. As a result I could/would not install that in my Slackware or ArchLinux. The other problem is OS independent. Long before the black ink is over it complains that there's no ink and refuses point blank to print! An expensive affair. I could control the damage by buying refills, donno how long that will work. Check http://www.linuxprinting.org/ before you buy. I will go for a hp next time. VR |
| |||
| Government satellites recorded Visvanath Ratnaweera saying: > > I have a Brother MFC 410CN which I will throw away ASAP. <snip> The MFC 7820N FSC I use works flawlessly and HP PSC 1510 as well (both are USB). Using Etch I didn't add anything to the system as it was already done during the initial install process. Had to "add" a printer in Gnome and pick the ppd was all. -- sk8r-365 http://goodbye-microsoft.com/ |
| |||
| In responce to Visvanath Ratnaweera 's post. I thought everyone should know: > Hi > > josh schrieb: >> all in one is brother better easier than hp to run? > > I have a Brother MFC 410CN which I will throw away ASAP. > > In terms of features, size, ergonomy and price you can't beat that > one, last year at least. The first problem was with the CUPS drivers. > Brother provides a closed source driver as a rpm, which worked under > SuSE. It sort of tweaks and replaces original components in CUPS. As > a result I could/would not install that in my Slackware or ArchLinux. > > The other problem is OS independent. Long before the black ink is > over it complains that there's no ink and refuses point blank to > print! An expensive affair. I could control the damage by buying > refills, donno how long that will work. > > Check http://www.linuxprinting.org/ before you buy. I will go for > a hp next time. > > VR i've had no real issues out of my brother hl-1040 aside from printing from web pages, and as long as im printing one copy of something. seems multiple copies messes with it a bit but for home use i rarely need more than 1 copy of anything. if i ever have to replace the laser printer i'll look into a hp if im still hearing these reports about brothers but otherwise i've been happy. just thought i'd post a "not all gloom and doom" post about brother printers *grin* -- Chris |
| |||
| Hi Chris and sk8r-365 (what language ist that?) Chris Thompson schrieb: > > i've had no real issues out of my brother hl-1040 aside from printing from We are comparing Brother MFC 410CN (inkjet multifuntion printer, scanner, copying and fax with USB/LAN) with Brother hl-1040 (laser printer)! A hard job, isn't it? > if i ever have to replace the laser printer i'll look into a hp if im > still hearing these reports about brothers but otherwise i've been happy. > > just thought i'd post a "not all gloom and doom" post about brother > printers *grin* I'm new to this NG and have no idea about those "not all gloom and doom" reports. Even then, one should't generalize so quickly, _one_ person is not happy with _one_ particular sample of a product. That's all. YMMV VR |
| |||
| In responce to Visvanath Ratnaweera 's post. I thought everyone should know: > Hi Chris and sk8r-365 (what language ist that?) > > Chris Thompson schrieb: > >> >> i've had no real issues out of my brother hl-1040 aside from printing from > > We are comparing Brother MFC 410CN (inkjet multifuntion printer, scanner, > copying and fax with USB/LAN) with Brother hl-1040 (laser printer)! A hard > job, isn't it? > >> if i ever have to replace the laser printer i'll look into a hp if im >> still hearing these reports about brothers but otherwise i've been happy. >> >> just thought i'd post a "not all gloom and doom" post about brother >> printers *grin* > > I'm new to this NG and have no idea about those "not all gloom and doom" > reports. Even then, one should't generalize so quickly, _one_ person is > not happy with _one_ particular sample of a product. That's all. > YMMV > > VR granted. one person isnt happy. but my point was that i've recently seen several (several being 20 or more) complaints about brother printers in general. not just in this forum but in several. if i wasnt exactly clear on that fact im sorry. i guess i was in my own head more than what was in the post. -- Chris |
| |||
| sk8r-365 wrote: > Government satellites recorded Visvanath Ratnaweera saying: > >> I have a Brother MFC 410CN which I will throw away ASAP. > <snip> > > The MFC 7820N FSC I use works flawlessly and HP PSC 1510 as well (both > are USB). Using Etch I didn't add anything to the system as it was > already done during the initial install process. Had to "add" a > printer in Gnome and pick the ppd was all. > il take that printer of u hands. il be at trash can looking for it dont let ink dry up give it to me. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|