vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| One of the most beautiful aspects of living this times is that most of the walls have come down. The wall that existed between Unix and MS-Windows has, greatly, fallen, so, when writing a program we must consider Unix and MSW users. However, with the huge number of widget-toolkits promising portability and speed in most of the operating systems, I find it hard to decide which of the C/C++ widget-toolkits to use. So, I would like to ask everyone what Widget Tool Kit you recommend that will not only make my programs portable, but that will also increase my marketability as a programmer/developer. Thank you in advance |
| ||||
| On 2008-01-29 20:23, jamiil wrote: > One of the most beautiful aspects of living this times is that most > of the walls have come down. > The wall that existed between Unix and MS-Windows has, greatly, > fallen, so, when writing a program we must consider Unix and MSW > users. However, with the huge number of widget-toolkits promising > portability and speed in most of the operating systems, I find it hard > to decide which of the C/C++ widget-toolkits to use. > So, I would like to ask everyone what Widget Tool Kit you recommend > that will not only make my programs portable, but that will also > increase my marketability as a programmer/developer. In c.l.c++ the usual recommendations are Qt and wxWidgets, they will both give you portability, search the archives for more extensive discussions on the subject. As for increasing your marketability as a programmer I do not think any one of them will be better, whichever you choose there is still a possibility that your future employer will use the other. How many different toolkits you know is not nearly as interesting as how quickly you will learn another one. PS. Cross-posting to so many groups is seldom a good idea, follow-ups set to c.l.c++. -- Erik Wikström |